Summary: With the periodic reoccurrence of
El Niño there are efforts to try and assess what the impact will be
on California, especially the state's water supply. This project examines
the precipitation for warm ENSO events across California.
Overview:
El
Niño events have are defined from the
Oceanic Niño Index (ONI)
into Weak, Moderate, Strong and Very Strong events. Then the seasonal
(July 1 through June 30) percent of normal precipitation for each
category, plus a collective category of "all" warm events, was
collated for a number of cities and geographic areas. These include
three major watersheds, the Northern Sierra Nevada Eight Station Index (8SI,
map), the Southern Sierra Nevada Five Station Index
(5SI, map) and the Tulare Basin Six Station Index
(6SI, map). Additionally the seven NCDC climate division (see
map) and the entire state of California
(CA) averages were compared to the ENSO
events. These comparisons was done in terms of both average
seasonal precipitation and also the number of occurrences within percent
of normal categories.
Observations:
The best
"signal" associated with warm ENSO (El Niño) events is, as would be
expected, with the "Very Strong" events all at least 140% of normal
except for Climate Divison 3 which was between 120% and 140%. In
the "Strong"category Southern California showed a significant
positive signature with the three seasons categorized as strong, all averaged above
normal precipitation with the highest percentages of normal (PON) in
Los Angeles, Climate Divisions 6 and 7. During weak and moderate warm events there is no such
signal with the number of years of above and below normal being fairly
evenly split statewide.
Important Caveat: The data
presented here is a climatology of past events and is made up of a broad
range of events from a small sample that are averaged together.
Consequently, like all averages, this type of data should not be used as a
forecast!
El Niño
Table 1. All El Niño Events - Average Percent of Normal Precipitation
(23 events)
ENSO Type |
Div. 1 |
Div. 2 |
Div. 3 |
Div. 4 |
Div. 5 |
Div. 6 |
Div. 7 |
CA |
8SI |
5SI |
6SI |
SF |
EKA |
SAC |
FAT |
LAX |
All
El Niño |
108% |
106% |
105% |
114% |
111% |
127% |
124% |
111% |
103% |
105% |
111% |
102% |
100% |
103% |
110% |
126% |
Weak
El Niño |
107% |
107% |
111% |
110% |
112% |
126% |
122% |
111% |
105% |
109% |
112% |
95% |
99% |
99% |
109% |
126% |
Moderate El Niño |
87% |
81% |
78% |
86% |
83% |
99% |
109% |
87% |
79% |
77% |
83% |
78% |
90% |
79% |
83% |
91% |
Strong El Niño |
115% |
110% |
105% |
131% |
116% |
133% |
120% |
116% |
102% |
100% |
112% |
123% |
96% |
116% |
113% |
140% |
Very
Strong El Niño |
162% |
167% |
150% |
198% |
182% |
212% |
190% |
174% |
162% |
174% |
191% |
181% |
146% |
183% |
190% |
209% |
Table 2. All El Niño - Years by Percent of Normal
Categories (23 events)
% of Normal |
Div. 1 |
Div. 2 |
Div. 3 |
Div. 4 |
Div. 5 |
Div. 6 |
Div. 7 |
CA |
8SI |
5SI |
6SI |
SF |
EKA |
SAC |
FAT |
LAX |
<80% |
7 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
9 |
8 |
8 |
3 |
9 |
8 |
6 |
80-100% |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
100-120% |
5 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
120-140% |
5 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
>140% |
4 |
4 |
3 |
8 |
7 |
9 |
9 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
11 |
Table 3. Weak El Niño - Years by Percent of Normal Categories
(12 events)
% of Normal |
Div. 1 |
Div. 2 |
Div. 3 |
Div. 4 |
Div. 5 |
Div. 6 |
Div. 7 |
CA |
8SI |
5SI |
6SI |
SF |
EKA |
SAC |
FAT |
LAX |
<80% |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
80-100% |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
100-120% |
4 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
120-140% |
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
>140% |
1 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
Table 4. Moderate El Niño - Years by Percent of Normal Categories
(6 events)
% of Normal |
Div. 1 |
Div. 2 |
Div. 3 |
Div. 4 |
Div. 5 |
Div. 6 |
Div. 7 |
CA |
8SI |
5SI |
6SI |
SF |
EKA |
SAC |
FAT |
LAX |
<80% |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
80-100% |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
100-120% |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
120-140% |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
>140% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Table 5. Strong El Niño - Years by Percent of Normal Categories
(3 events)
% of Normal |
Div. 1 |
Div. 2 |
Div. 3 |
Div. 4 |
Div. 5 |
Div. 6 |
Div. 7 |
CA |
8SI |
5SI |
6SI |
SF |
EKA |
SAC |
FAT |
LAX |
<80% |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
80-100% |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100-120% |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
120-140% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
>140% |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
Table 6. Very Strong El Niño - Years by Percent of Normal Categories
(2 events)
% of Normal |
Div. 1 |
Div. 2 |
Div. 3 |
Div. 4 |
Div. 5 |
Div. 6 |
Div. 7 |
CA |
8SI |
5SI |
6SI |
SF |
EKA |
SAC |
FAT |
LAX |
<80% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
80-100% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100-120% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
120-140% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
>140% |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Table 7. Percent of Normal (1981-2010) Rainfall for All El Nino
Years |
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
CA |
8SI |
5SI |
6SI |
SF |
EKA |
SAC |
FAT |
LAX |
|
|
|
Normal |
49.77" |
36.69" |
20.46" |
22.03" |
20.70" |
17.80" |
6.35" |
24.10" |
53.90" |
41.76" |
30.01" |
23.65" |
40.33" |
18.52" |
11.50" |
14.93" |
ENSO Type |
Weak |
1951 |
- |
1952 |
123% |
129% |
133% |
135% |
135% |
162% |
147% |
134% |
132% |
123% |
148% |
138% |
118% |
129% |
121% |
176% |
Weak |
1952 |
- |
1953 |
118% |
102% |
98% |
80% |
82% |
75% |
75% |
96% |
100% |
75% |
88% |
89% |
118% |
88% |
84% |
63% |
Weak |
1953 |
- |
1954 |
107% |
89% |
78% |
78% |
82% |
91% |
77% |
89% |
92% |
81% |
86% |
60% |
105% |
73% |
77% |
80% |
Strong |
1957 |
- |
1958 |
153% |
142% |
128% |
161% |
143% |
160% |
126% |
147% |
134% |
124% |
137% |
154% |
121% |
155% |
165% |
142% |
Weak |
1958 |
- |
1959 |
77% |
68% |
73% |
61% |
59% |
53% |
59% |
67% |
71% |
61% |
48% |
44% |
81% |
59% |
60% |
37% |
Moderate |
1963 |
- |
1964 |
78% |
68% |
85% |
62% |
71% |
71% |
79% |
73% |
67% |
71% |
70% |
52% |
93% |
67% |
59% |
53% |
Strong |
1965 |
- |
1966 |
88% |
71% |
79% |
75% |
73% |
97% |
109% |
81% |
71% |
75% |
63% |
69% |
80% |
57% |
53% |
137% |
Weak |
1968 |
- |
1969 |
120% |
128% |
147% |
161% |
169% |
175% |
142% |
145% |
127% |
163% |
186% |
106% |
118% |
130% |
200% |
184% |
Weak |
1969 |
- |
1970 |
111% |
113% |
115% |
80% |
86% |
63% |
69% |
97% |
111% |
97% |
79% |
88% |
95% |
93% |
79% |
52% |
Strong |
1972 |
- |
1973 |
95% |
110% |
104% |
144% |
122% |
129% |
113% |
114% |
96% |
95% |
128% |
145% |
86% |
136% |
121% |
142% |
Weak |
1976 |
- |
1977 |
41% |
41% |
68% |
50% |
50% |
66% |
84% |
52% |
37% |
45% |
54% |
47% |
44% |
38% |
66% |
82% |
Weak |
1977 |
- |
1978 |
127% |
131% |
124% |
157% |
157% |
207% |
200% |
147% |
132% |
148% |
155% |
114% |
90% |
142% |
158% |
224% |
Weak |
1979 |
- |
1980 |
110% |
118% |
133% |
121% |
128% |
165% |
180% |
128% |
111% |
134% |
136% |
104% |
94% |
128% |
104% |
181% |
Very
Strong |
1982 |
- |
1983 |
162% |
166% |
164% |
193% |
186% |
199% |
191% |
176% |
166% |
187% |
194% |
161% |
147% |
192% |
205% |
209% |
Moderate |
1986 |
- |
1987 |
72% |
62% |
67% |
60% |
63% |
61% |
82% |
65% |
61% |
56% |
61% |
59% |
69% |
56% |
81% |
51% |
Moderate |
1987 |
- |
1988 |
77% |
73% |
64% |
73% |
73% |
99% |
115% |
77% |
65% |
63% |
73% |
75% |
80% |
75% |
70% |
84% |
Moderate |
1991 |
- |
1992 |
68% |
71% |
63% |
92% |
78% |
124% |
155% |
82% |
67% |
64% |
65% |
81% |
54% |
71% |
96% |
141% |
Weak |
1994 |
- |
1995 |
143% |
163% |
166% |
161% |
164% |
182% |
149% |
161% |
159% |
169% |
153% |
144% |
128% |
127% |
165% |
163% |
Very
Strong |
1997 |
- |
1998 |
154% |
160% |
132% |
191% |
168% |
211% |
177% |
167% |
154% |
154% |
179% |
200% |
145% |
174% |
175% |
208% |
Moderate |
2002 |
- |
2003 |
117% |
105% |
91% |
99% |
94% |
105% |
90% |
103% |
108% |
91% |
104% |
101% |
132% |
90% |
85% |
110% |
Weak |
2004 |
- |
2005 |
101% |
110% |
115% |
144% |
139% |
192% |
206% |
130% |
107% |
129% |
127% |
135% |
110% |
118% |
138% |
249% |
Weak |
2006 |
- |
2007 |
75% |
62% |
56% |
50% |
53% |
31% |
32% |
57% |
67% |
59% |
56% |
71% |
88% |
59% |
52% |
22% |
Moderate |
2009 |
- |
2010 |
99% |
97% |
93% |
115% |
105% |
114% |
113% |
103% |
99% |
107% |
113% |
102% |
110% |
112% |
107% |
110% |
Copyright © 2015,
Golden
Gate Weather Services.
Reproduction in full or part is prohibited without permission
|