An Analysis of El Niņo, La
Niņa and California Rainfall
Jan Null, CCM
(always a work in progress, last updated October 2004)
Early indications are that winter 2004-2005 will see a marginal El Niņo develop in the tropical Pacific. But what does all this mean for rainfall across California? If all the hype of previous El Niņo and La Niņa events is to be believed then it's time to start looking for high ground. Or maybe just to look at what really has happened during past events.
The "cool" event counterpart of El Niņo is La Niņa. These events also disrupt the normal weather patterns in other parts of the world, though their impact is generally not as significant as El Niņo in the United States.
Even within these occurrences there is considerable variation and not only the intensity but even the beginning and ending dates may vary from researcher to researcher. For the purposes of this analysis the list developed at http://ggweather.com/enso/years.htm will be used as delineated in Table 1. Since these events impact winter precipitation in the Northern Hemisphere the indicated season is for the beginning of the event (i.e., 1950 would indicate the winter of 1950-1951).
Seasonal rainfall totals were also calculated for each of the 7 California climate divisions, t, the California Department of Water Resources Northern Sierra 8 Station Index (an average of precipitation totals for Mt. Shasta City, Shasta Dam, Brush Creek, Mineral Ranger Station, Quincy, Sierraville Ranger Station, Blue Canyon and Pacific House), and for 6 key city locations (Eureka, San Francisco, Sacramento, Fresno, Los Angeles and San Diego. These were then normalized and plotted as a percentage of the average rainfall for the period and color-coded by the type of event (Figs 8-21).
For the four strong El Niņos (Fig 2) the positive signal is even stronger with no significant signal for weak to moderate events (Fig 3). Interestingly, the weak to moderate La Niņas show a more significant signal than the stronger events. In these cases all but Northwest and Northeast California (i.e., climate divisions 1 and 3) show a negative anomaly, yet in the strong La Niņa cases the Northwest (Climate Division 1) is wet, Southern California (Divisions 6 and 7) are dry and Climate Divisions 2,3, 4 & 5 are neutral.
In addition to looking at the response of rainfall to various El Niņo and La Niņa events for the individual climate divisions and cities (Fig. 8-14 and Fig. 16-21) a key indicator is the 8 Station Index which reflects rainfall into the important watersheds of the Northern Sierra Nevada and Shasta Ranges (Fig. 15). The signal for weak to moderate El Niņos is mixed with 4 of the 9 events being above normal and rest below and the weak La Niņas were equally mixed with 4 cases above normal and 4 below.
|For Additional El Niņo and La Niņa resources see: http://ggweather.com/enso.htm|
Questions, comments or suggestions. Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright Š 2003, Golden Gate Weather Services.
Reproduction in full or part is prohibited without permission.